A critical error that leads to many dangerous product violations is the reference to anything that is dangerous as “dangerous substances”. However, the term “hazardous material” is defined by the Safe Pipeline and Hazardou Materials Administration, since it is transportation, that “dangerous chemical” is defined by OSHA in terms of hazard communication and that “dangerous substance” is the term used by the EPA to refer to elements and compounds identified as hazardous to the environment. What makes the distinctions between the different concepts so decisive for compliance is that other agencies that go beyond those mentioned above refer to these terms in their requirements. Before compliance is achieved, it is important that the agencies concerned understand how each agency defines what is dangerous and what each agency expects with respect to dangerous products to understand dangerous compliance. In search of a compliance partner, contact GSM`s compliance experts today. As with any subject, terminology is a fundamental element in building a solid foundation of understanding. The term “dangerous material” is often used to describe hazardous chemicals, hazardous substances and hazardous substances. In this series, the term “dangerous products” will serve as a collective reference to all dangerous things – chemicals, materials and substances – to avoid confusion. Manufacturers and distributors are subject to regulation, but the compliance of these companies ranges from blissful ignorance to deliberate distrust. But navigating laws and agencies can at best be a challenge. The aim of this series of articles is to provide an overview of the communication and management of what is and what is not and who is responsible for its compliance. The tables on the right illustrate the differences between GHS and HMR in the definition of flammable liquids. The differences between what is defined as dangerous in GHS and HMR also extend to other characteristics, such as toxicity, where GHS is a broader network than HMR.
This is not to say that there is no overlap between agencies, since they refer to each other`s rules. For example, the EPA refers to the quantities to be reported for hazardous substances, to which PHMSA refers in the HMR. OSHA refers to hazardous substances in the field of hazard communication. The EPA draws attention to hazardous and universal waste subjected to 49 CFRs when it is proposed for transportation. United States Postal Service has its own rules on hazardous materials that are transported by mail, as one federal authority cannot be competent for another, but it directly lists the HMR as criteria to be applied.